Challenging Conventions At one time, Bible scholars challenged the use of theology, especially conventional theology, in their reading of the Bible. Instead, these Bible scholars were critical. Not in the sense that they were negative but that they subjected conventions to the rigor of the Bible’s evidence. Critical, too, meant they read the Bible in its historical context. As well, they read through the grid of the reconstruction of the texts – Isaiah was not by one author, Daniel was late, etc..
I find the corporate aspect of resurrection particularly interesting...
Interesting
This is all quite remarkable. I don’t think I should tell my friends....