3 Comments
Nov 23, 2022Liked by Scot McKnight

‘Circumcision was the sign of covenant membership (Genesis 17). It was, Genesis tells us, “an everlasting covenant” between God and Israel (17:13). ‘

‘What did not happen tells the story of shifting from the Moses Era into the Christ Era.’

This is what stood out to me. “Everlasting covenant” shifts from Moses Era into the Christ Era. So my thought is are we misinterpreting what God meant with “Everlasting Covenant”? Because it does change which makes it easy to say Genesis 17:13 is wrong. I know God this was only between God and Israel also. Could God mean it as eternity with Jesus and not meant to have every generation be circumcised? Interesting post today! Got me thinking.... Thank you.

Expand full comment
author

Connie, One can read "everlasting" as "Era Covenant," and then restrict the Era for the time until Christ -- as Gal 3:19-26 does, as Hebrews does. Or one could say it is everlasting for Jews who abide in that covenant. Or one could say it is everlasting for that author, but that author did not know the Era could change into "baptism" -- which could mean baptism fulfills circumcision.

Expand full comment

Ohhhh, that is good! Thank you.

Expand full comment